Law Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3500 words

Law - Assignment ExampleIt may seem as a case of bad faith coming from Michael, who has attempted to absent advantage of the good will that has been associated with the trademark of Facebook. According to the Federal Trademark Dilution Act of 1995 this fact may conduct to dilution.1Moreover, the U.S. Trademark Act of 1946 stipulated as wicked the action of registering or using a domain name that is identical or very similar to a trademark previously registered. Also, Michaels casebook may be qualified by ACPA as typo squatting the registration of domain names similar to registered trademarks, but which differ by hotshot or two letters. This is obvious as the words facebook and casebook are similar, the only difference being the first letter. This fact would give Facebook the right to gravel a claim according to the URDP rules.Another important factor in Michaels case is the geographical side of the host of his sacksite which is Ukraine and the location of the end-user which is Canada. It is obvious that the location of the end-user is of a bigger importance than the location of the host, since the Copyright Act is meant to protect the copyright in Canada. Nevertheless, the location of the host is determinative and its importance should not be minimized.The fact that Michaels help Carrie did not provide casebook.ca with an original appearance, but copied it from facebook.com is another illegal action. In U&R Tax, a set of requirements were do in order for a reproduction to be proved. These factors areAnalyzing the above criteria, it is obvious that the user interface design of casebook.ca was literally copied from the website facebook.com by Carrie. Through this action, the web site casebook.ca diminishes the value of Facebooks copyright, and the material taken is used in an identical way as the facebook.com website as a user interface design. Moreover, no(prenominal) of the Facebook codes were mentioned, the design